Download: RSS | Wireless

Site Comments

Comments
l2874178 - 8/19/2008
Now that is what I call Cut spending!!!

mommysami03 - 8/18/2008
I know one of the children that this man has defiled and he is a genuine innocent little boy that does not deserve to have this to over come growing up. I hope this man spends more of his life in jail then he did ruining others lives. He will get what he derserves- Karma will serve him justice.

confused - 8/18/2008
Quote for the day: "Whatever you give a woman, she's going to multiply. If you give her sperm, she'll give you a baby. If you give her a house, she'll give you a home. If you give her groceries, she'll give you a meal. If you give her a smile, she'll give you her heart. She multiplies and enlarges what is given to her." So - if you give her crap, you will receive a bucket full of shiiit. Love and appreciate all the women in your life. BELIEVE IT! I've got more shiiiit to give if anyone wants it!! love, hugs and kisses, swan

confused - 8/18/2008
--------------on anger and hate-------------------- * Anger is love's energy misused. * When we hate others, we hate ourselves. * An act of hostility, like a ripple on a pond, radiates out from the giver until eternity. * holding a grudge produces negative energy. it not only hurts the one you hold the grudge against it also hurts you and others. * As long as you are a child of rage you will not find the power to know your potential as a child of God. * When you feel tempted by the emottion of anger---retreat. * When you see someone full of hatred or anger, treat them with love so that you can be an example they may later relfect. Thank you all for caring about my nephew and his wife. we all love them dearly. But they need to let them work this out. And we need to shut the hell up.

RenoLasVegas - 8/18/2008
I will not view any further comments on this page. Stalkers can be dangerous people. Responding to "really's" rants, is tantamount to waving a red flag in front of a raging bull. In the past, although I have been bewildered by your unrelenting and unsolicited attention, especially in the face of the absolute rejection you have encountered, I have felt mostly pity and sympathy for you and I shall continue to do so. I realize that the aging process has been very hard for you, but it is something that most of us must eventually face. Hopefully, you can take heart in the fact that people, in their later years still have many positive contributions to make. Please seek help.

flagt65 - 8/18/2008
I would like to see the "journalistic shield law" extended to bloggers. However, the law should hold bloggers to a reasonable standard of responsibility to avoid onlining private information about others. If all information that went online had to be 100% accurate there wouldn't be any internet. Take, for example, the weather. I check the weather out online. It is invariably, partly or entirely inaccurate. So the weather caster would be the first to go. So, what I do is take the weather casters forecast as only one source of information. I've found that my thumb gives a much better prediction. If it aches a little, it will rain a little, a lot, then there will be a flood. So, just look at online information as one source, put it all together with other sources and then you've got something.nhoward

RenoLasVegas - 8/18/2008
There is no presumption here. I know who "really" really is, however, you seem to be mistaken about my identity. "You weren't allegedly arrested or allegedly charged". Surely you don't think Michaelagh Keller would address you, even in such an arm's length way. People don't generally encourage their stalkers.

really - 8/18/2008
It's funny that you "RenoLasVegas" would presume to know who I am when the news of this arrest has had airplay, newspaper print and internet distribution. How can you be so sure that I am not a neighbor or simply a citizen who has an opinion on what sure sounds like a case of domestic violence or even someone who knows you personally and has taken offense to what happened, allegedly of course. And it's not that often that a wife is the "alleged" perpetrator, yes this news would be interesting to a lot of people. You weren't allegedly arrested or allegedly charged, although the alleging will be a debate in front of the judge and will probably go something like this.. he cut himself somehow and somehow the police were called and they mistakenly arrested and charged someone who did nothing at all, really your honor it's all a big misunderstanding. That would be the blaming I mentioned, you will try to turn this around somehow to get off the hook for the charge and that may mean your husband may have to lie to protect you, take the blame for you in essence and you'll allow him to do too. You can either work up a few tears and try to look A) innocent or B) deeply remorseful because you had been drinking.. yes alcohol is mentioned and gee they even kept you overnight without bail, yeah read the article and your comment again maybe it will get through to you that this really did happen. Poor pretty you, smile nice for the judge and I'm sure it will all go away, on your police record anyway but not the fact the you were arrested and charged. No you don't know me, you simply think you do. And as I said, and you just proved with your comments, looks in your case are only skin deep, your underneath is showing and no amount of makeup is covering that up now.

RenoLasVegas - 8/17/2008
I'm guessing that this is the lady whom we all laughingly refer to as "the geriatric stalker in the sky with diamonds"....lol. I didn't realize that you subscribed to the local Watertown news. Oh no, of course, I had almost forgotten that you "google" the names on a daily basis. Guess you have more time on your hands now that you're no longer fantasizing via passionate emails about "kneeling at Sir Robby's feet". You seem to be oblivious to the words "allege", "charged" (ever heard of the innocent until proven guilty concept?). I'll have to read my previous comment, because I don't recall blaming anyone at all.

flagt65 - 8/17/2008
A driver who has been drinking is 385 times more likely to have an accident than a non-drinking driver. The surest way to lower the incidence of DWI is automatic license revocation. Drinking and driving is down but drinking while using drugs is up. In my opinion drinking and driving is a problem that isn't going away. The powers that be have been trying since the invention of the car to get the drunks off the road and haven't been able to do it. The best that can be done is to lower the incidence of it. In my opinion the new problem is drugs and a very large number of people on the road that have no respect for others, drivers or people walking or their own passengers. I don't see any real improvement. I think it's just going to go on and on.nhoward